|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE BUILDING
OF THE During the fall months of
the year 1908, James Reith, at that time Reeve of Grand Valley in the James Reith’s initial
request to Carnegie in July 1908 for $15,000 was obviously unrealistic.
He soon discovered that there were numerous forms and schedules to
be completed for the One might wonder if James
Reith realized what he had gotten himself into.
Although he was a successful business man and active in local
politics (3), he was probably not quite prepared to deal with the
overbearing and precise demands from the Carnegie Foundation.
And, as Margaret Beckman points out in her history of the Carnegie
libraries in Soon after the amount of
the grant was decided, letters to and from Carnegie’s office came fast
and furious. From the outset
progress was not smooth. After receiving a set of proposed plans from
Reith, Bertram replied bluntly, “The plans will not do… “ground
floor is badly arranged”…The second floor is entirely unnecessary”.
Apparently the town had asked for the space for a large lecture
hall, ideally on a second storey. Bertram’s
response to this was in his inimitable style.
“A hall 70 ft. by 40 ft. is substantially a ‘town hall’ which
will accommodate more than your whole adult population and is not a
lecture hall”. (Note: The
population of Grand Valley in 1911 was 775.) This
attempt to get money for more than a library is summarily dismissed in
Bertrams’ letter of After this letter there appears to have been a hiatus in any further planning for about two years, during which time James Reith finished his term as Reeve, eventually becoming the Chairman of the Library Board. And some evidence has come to light that, during that period, the proposals for a new Carnegie Library had met with some opposition. Things were to come to a head soon after negotiations began again - in January 1911. Unaware of rumblings in the little community, Bertram continued to write meticulously about the early plans. “Please do not bild (sic) until you get plans approved “(Feb. 2, 11),”…too much space wasted in lobby and landing, lavatories, toilets…”. Bertram appears to have had little patience with architects – “…there does not appear to be a need for two entrances, which fact of itself shows economy was not considered. What experience has your proposed architect had for bilding (sic) libraries?” Then on March 13th 1911, a disturbing letter, along with a petition signed by fifteen residents of Grand Valley, was sent to James Bertram in New York, stating that, “this proposed library has been a source of contention in this little village, the majority of the people are opposed to its being built”. The letter also clarified the reason why everything had been put on hold. Two years earlier “they had wanted a library with a Hall overhead and in fact it was for this purpose the grant was really asked for” (just what Bertram had suspected in rejecting the original plan). Other problems were outlined in the letter. The Town Council had not only been unsuccessful in allotting enough money for the cost of annual library maintenance but had failed to purchase a suitable site. A note at the bottom of the petition indicated that the Reeve and the Council were also opposed to receiving the Carnegie grant but were not asked to sign the petition. Bertram wasted no time in
informing Reith of the contents of the letter and the petition and the
latter responded promptly with a counterattack.
By the end of March he had gathered 132 signatures from the
town’s residents along with assurances from the Reeve and Council, who
were all ”heartily in a accord with the proposed Free Library to be
erected in Grand Valley under the terms of (Carnegie’s) generous
grant”. This document was
sent directly to Andrew Carnegie with an accompanying letter to Bertram,
deploring the uncalled for manner in which “the opponents” voiced
their opinions and pointing out that in several cases their reasons for
opposing the grant were personal (e.g. the owner of the property at
present occupied by the existing library would lose $100 in rent).
Reith assured Bertram that the whole town Council was working with
the Library Board in getting the plans prepared.
Furthermore, “the Council has always supported the library
liberally in financial matters and are prepared to honour all engagements
entered into”. He also
stated that the site for the new library had been settled – just north
of the business section – and that suitable material would be salvaged
from the brick building on the site at the time.
This appears to have satisfied the Carnegie Foundation and once
again the weekly correspondence with James Bertram in Detailed planning now
began in earnest. First of all
Bertram was critical of the proposed site.
The location chosen for the new library was to be on the north-east
corner of The next step was to
submit the architect’s drawings for Bertram’s scrutiny.
George Gray of Harriston had been appointed the architect for the
Grand Valley Library. (He had
also designed the Carnegie libraries for Apart from the sarcastic tone of this criticism, Reith, who couldn’t be faulted in spelling, or grammar, must have been mystified by Bertram’s irregular spelling. It is most likely that he was unaware that the simplified spelling of certain words was, in fact, deliberate. Melvin Dewey, a good friend of Carnegie’s, and who was later to become well known for the development of the Dewey Decimal Classification – a cataloguing system adopted by most American and Canadian libraries (and still in use today), - had also, along with Bertram, proposed “to make the English language the common language of the world”. This scheme for a simplified style of spelling held great appeal for Andrew Carnegie and he promoted its use. In any case, James
Reith’s replies to Bertram’s criticism were eminently tactful, but no
less resolute in their justification of a larger building.
He spent some time in the new Fergus library, talking to staff who
were already complaining about the cramped space.
He argued that the Bertram pursued his objection to a long and narrow building by also registering concern about waste space in passageways and stairways. But Reith held firm. After further trips to Fergus, he noted, “…their stack room is so narrow…they can hardly get around the end of the rack”, and, “…they were much too cramped”. He also argues that a narrow but longer building would suit the lot best:, that “a few feet does not add much to the cost, and it makes it a great deal more comfortable inside”. Unable to accept Reith’s adamant refusal to make changes, Bertram finally submitted the plans to an “architect expert in library planning” and sent back not only the resulting criticism, but, a brand new suggestion for rearranging entirely the accommodation. In early May Reith took the new plan to his committee and, with gracious thanks, returned to Bertram his own version of the plan with some modifications which included details that he felt would improve the appearance of the interior space. By now Bertram was at the end of this tether. “You must be aware that while preserving an appearance of taking advice, you are rejecting all.” … “…you adhere to your own set ideas in spite of experienced advice.”…”…you like appearance…better…”than ”economical arrangement and effective (sic) working”. Reith offered little in the way of compromise, however, insisting, contrary to Bertram’s advice, that the two Reading Rooms be in the front. But he did agree to allow an alternative plan also to be considered and both were submitted to Bertram’s office. On May 31st. a
Mr. R.A. Franks, President of the Home Trust Company in Reith’s response to the
plan’s approval indicated that they wanted to build immediately.
By February he was able to anticipate the operating costs of the
new library by obtaining figures from the Fergus Library for the year
1911. Heating had cost $170,
electric light $24.85, the librarian $200, and the caretaker $60.
Local tenders to tear down and salvage material from the Davey
Block were received in late February.
George Gray estimated the cost of the construction of the building
($5,354) early in February and drew up blueprints by early March.
Bricks and cement were promised for May from With the delivery of
supplies of brick, cement, beams and lumber, work on the building began in
the summer and continued in to the fall.
It appears that the building was all but complete by the end of the
year with window and door hardware being installed by November.
Not everything proceeded smoothly, however.
On The new Carnegie Library
opened on During the early years, books could be exchanged on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays. As the collection expanded, and use increased, the new building served the community well. It remained an object of considerable civic pride, which must have been very gratifying for James Reith. By 1955 after the building was modernized, there were 4,500 volumes in the library and an annual circulation of 2,100. Use of the building for non-library purposes changed over the years. In its capacity as a community centre many events took place in the space below the library (built in lieu of the second storey lecture hall as originally requested) and became known as “Carnegie Hall”. Seats could be reserved for the many plays and concerts held there and which were accommodated by the large curtained stage. Dances, presentations, the monthly meetings of the Junior Farmers and the Junior Women’s Institute were also regular events. For many years the East Luther Council and Grand Valley Council held their meetings in the large east room of the library. In 1940 Andrew Carnegie registered his objections to this arrangement by pointing out that this was contrary to the original understanding as stated in the provision of the building grant. In fact, after 1947, two small rooms were used by the Health Unit and the Read Cross, and it was many years before all these areas reverted to library use. Periodically the library
was painted inside and out, and in the 1960s new chairs were bought and
the large clock repaired. By
1970 circulation had increased to 10,000 volumes a year.
A new fan was bought and new lights installed.
Books with large print and non-glare pages were purchased for the
senior citizen clientele and a 16 mm film service became available.
In 1980, after the East Luther Council moved out and the Grand
Valley Council moved downstairs, the large east room was converted into a
children’s library. This
inviting venue was made possible through local donations, several
fund-raising activities and a Wintario grant.
Further improvements resulted in the opening of a new Resource
Centre in 1982, again partly paid for by another Wintario grant.
All the old shelving was replaced and the floor refurbished.
This centre incorporated new encyclopedias, other reference works,
a magazine section and a fine literature section.
Two years later more shelving was added in both the children’s
and adult section and in that same year the Grand Valley Library became
part of the Saugeen Regional Library System which had its headquarters in
Over the years the
Carnegie Library of Grand Valley had seen much change and growth in its
valuable service to the community. It
was extremely well cared for through the various efforts of its library
boards and librarians, and generous local citizens.
A solid landmark, no one was prepared for its demise.
But on Written by Jane Cooper –
NOTES 1. In 2001, while going through some old papers, Marilyn Stuckey, a long time Grand Valley resident, discovered a pile of old letters and other material, all relating to the planning and building of the Grand Valley Carnegie Library from 1908-1913. These papers provide the basis for this “behind the scenes” history of that undertaking. 2. Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish immigrant, raised in poverty and who went out to work at the age of twelve, came to Pittsburgh in the mid 1800s. Eventually he built up an industrial empire based on the manufacture of steel. It was estimated that by the time he retired he was worth $400 million. A strong advocate of the concept of “meritocracy”, i.e. Anyone who was smart, through hard work, could be successful, Carnegie also believed that those who had acquired wealth had a moral obligation to give away their fortunes before they died in order to benefit society. Of the $333 million he did give away, ninety percent was distributed during his lifetime, much of it to build 2,509 public libraries in the English-speaking world – the United States, UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. He favoured the support of libraries for two reasons, first, that anyone with the right inclination and desire, could educate himself; and, second, that immigrants needed to acquire a cultural knowledge of “America’ (i.e. their own country) and this could be done in a library. As quoted in the New York Times in 1903 – “In a public library men could at least share cultural opportunities on a basis of equality”. In 3. James J. Reith, son of a Scottish immigrant (like Andrew Carnegie) and well known Grand Valley resident, assumed his father’s successful hardware, dry goods and grocery business in 1905, and continued in this vocation until his death in 1925. He was active in local politics, served as Reeve in 1909 and 1910, when he was also the County’s Warden. After his stint as Reeve, he, along with George Tough, chose a site for the new library, and then Mr. Reith undertook the supervision of the planning and building of the library, as chairman of the Library Board. During his active public life his numerous endeavours included the building of an Agricultural Hall and establishment of a bowling club. SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Papers.
Hereward Women’s
Institute Tweedsmuir
History. ( Beckman, Margaret.
The Best Gift: a record of the Carnegie Libraries in
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||